|
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
|
Qatar Classic 2003 Women: 2003
Qatar Masters
SQUASHTALK
TODAY |
Day
One Highlights in Qatar |
||||||
|
November 30, 2003, ©2003, SquashTalk The recent World Team Championships in Vienna had a smorgasbord of squash in the pool stages, but it was hard to find a good close match. This tournament poses a different problem. There are so many good matches that you have to choose what to watch and when. Aside from Joe's game I followed a couple of matches that presented upset possibilities and enjoyable squash. Joe
Kneipp versus Alex Gough
Gough's results of
late at PSA Joe started this match well winning the first three points comfortably and completely dictating the rallies. I was hoping that is would set the tone for the rest of the match, but Gough immediately turned things around and controlled the T for the next four points. The scores were close until 7-7. Gough is very strong at the front of the court. He is the only player in the game that uses a forehand topspin drop shot, and when it works it is lethal. Joe stopped going short too much and began using the lob very effectively and had Gough doing a ridiculous amount of work. From 7-7 Joe pulled away and didn't allow the Welshman to win another point in the game. In the second Gough was obviously still tired, the two-minute break obviously not making a huge difference. There were some long, hard rallies early on, and despite Gough controlling plenty of these, Joe was fresher and it was affecting the Welshman more. Joe got a big lead and Gough began guessing shots and the rallies became shorter as Joe finished reasonably comfortably, 15-6. In the third Joe went to a 9-2 lead, then Gough unexpectedly shook hands and conceded the match. He said he woke up feeling bad and was even having trouble focussing between points. He didn't have food poisoning or similar symptoms, but wasn't 100%, and court sprints don't help in that situation. Ricketts
versus Abbas.
While there aren't any easy matches in the first round, there are definitely some where the outcome seems more obvious than others. This match while promising to be tough would seem like a certain win to Ricketts. If there is ever a good example of mental preparation for a tournament, this was it. Abbas was playing Dutch league a couple of weeks ago. He is on Tommy Berden's team and they got to talking about the draw for this tournament. Tommy understandably expected Abbas to be unhappy with his draw. If you have the possibility of getting any player in the top 16, number 6 in the world isn't great. Instead of being disappointed Abbas told Tommy he thought it was a good draw and he was happy to play Ricketts. This is a strange reaction when playing one of the most consistent players over the past 18 months. But Abbas was confident before the match and took that attitude on court and was able to cause an upset in four games 12/15-15/7-15/10-15/11.. Mansoor Zaman
versus Olli Tuominen So, as I was enjoying the hospitality normally reserved solely for Olli, I watched this match as a fringe supporter with the relatively large Finnish support group. Perhaps four supporters isn't so large, but the desert of Doha is a long way physically and meteorologically from Helsinki, and you'd be surprised at the amount of noise these four Finns made. Around twenty percent of Doha's population originates from Pakistan and there were a lot of Pakistanis present at the match supporting Mansoor, but they struggled to drown out the noise of the Finnish crowd. These two started wonderfully with some long tough rallies. Mansoor is left-handed and holds the ball well and likes to hit winners. Olli's game strengths can vary but when he's playing well he often gets to lots of shots that seem like they should be winners and then hits a well placed shot or hits the ball surprisingly hard from an odd position. They both played well and the first game progressed with Mansoor maintaining a slight lead. Olli caught him at 9-9 and then 12-12. Mansoor should give coaching lessons on how to hit a working boast - his are spectacular. He was playing these so they hit the front wall just above the tin and forced Olli to lunge right into the corners to cut the ball off before it bounced twice before the side wall or into the nick. Unfortunately for the Pakistani Olli was not only able to lunge to these, but was giving a good demonstration on how to hit a great drop shot from a lunging position. It's a pretty basic concept that if your opponent boasts you, he's normally in the back of the court so that if you then hit a drop shot he is forced to run the longest length of the court, whereas you only had to move from the T. Despite Mansoor's great boasts, Olli's drop shots were causing the Pakistani to run more and he was showing early signs of fatigue. From 12-12 Mansoor got to 14 first, but on his first game ball Olli hit a forehand overhead crosscourt that rolled out of the nick. Mansoor had one more chance but made an error to level the score. Both players hit winners to go 15-15, then the Fin hit a back hand drop shot winner to get his first game ball. During the next rally there was a weird interference. Mansoor hit a bad cross court from the backhand front that sprayed into the middle, but as he moved back to get ready for Olli?s shot there was a strange contact that left Olli on the ground, but still able to hit the ball as he fell, only straight back at himself for an obvious stroke. The contact seemed light but Olli was on the ground for a while, and then tried to explain to the ref that Mansoor had stood on his foot causing him to fall and deserved a let. It was difficult to see the actual contact, but it was obvious that something happened and Olli?s explanation at this point made sense and should have warranted the ref to change his 'no let' decision. Olli isn't one of the player's that would lie in this situation. The ref stuck with his decision and Olli was forced to play on, his injury seeming insignificant. I found out later that it had hurt him considerably and from that point on he was unable to lunge properly on his right leg, but he did a good job of concealing it from the crowd, and more importantly his opponent. At 16-16 Mansoor hit a disappointing forehand drive into the tin giving the crucial first game up. The second game was a virtual walkover with Olli going from 5-2 to 15-3 in a few minutes. Mansoor was simply trying to hit nicks off the serves and wasn't willing to rally. This changed completely in the third. He was still going for nicks, but now he was happy to back them up with more shots and rallies. Olli made more mistakes and Mansoor took the game 15-10. In the fourth Mansoor went to a 6-1 lead, but couldn't stop the Finn from winning the next 8 points. These points were a mixture of winners from Olli and errors from Mansoor who was too impatient when it counted. The scores slowly progressed with Olli reaching 14-11 and match ball. Perfect length from Mansoor saved the first match ball, then a cross court nick attempt from Olli should have rolled, but popped up a tiny bit, just enough for Mansoor to lunge to it and hit a wonderful counter drop winner and save the second match ball. The Pakistani then hit a backhand drop winner to level the score at 14-14. Olli sensibly called set 1 to give himself another match ball. The word tuominen in Finnish can mean numerous things including a present or gift. There was no present or gift for the Pakistani fans as Olli hit a forehand volley drop shot to win the match. He was particularly happy with this result because the injury he sustained in the first game was quite bad and he thought Mansoor would notice and exploit it. Amr Shabana
versus Shahier Razik Of the two players Shabana is more known for his winners, but someone forgot to tell Razik as he started the match with a forehand winner, a backhand volley cross court nick, and an 8-4 lead. Razik doesn't blast the ball, instead preferring to use well placed and well weighted shots to force the other guy as deep into each corner. This soft touch allows him to aim well and keep the ball nice and tight. Shabana is one of the best players at holding and delaying the ball and was able to use this to slowly claw his way back into the game, eventually catching Razik at 13, then winning the next two points for the first game. The score was again close in the second. At 9-8 to Shabana he hit a backhand (he's left handed) overhead cross court nick that Razik was able to get to comfortably, but it rolled out of the nick and between his legs. Never a fun point to be on the receiving end of. Perhaps this demoralised Razik, or more likely it encouraged Shabana who pulled away for a 15-9 second game victory. The third game was similar with Shabana winning it 15-11 and taking the match, but these games could have gone either way and there was little difference in the standard of play. As expected this was an enjoyable match to watch.
|
|||||||
|
Squashtalk.com
All materials © 1999-2003. Communicate with us at info@squashtalk.com. |
|||||||